September 29, 2005
U.S. Forces Catch Over a Hundred Terror Suspects in Iraq: Dumb Terrorist Leaves RPG Thank You Note on Cell Phone
U.S. forces have captured over a hundred suspected terrorists in Iraq in the past week. Coalition Forces, often teaming up with Iraqi Army Soldiers, conducted 69 cordon and search operations and raids against anti-Iraqi forces over the past week, seizing 135 terror suspects and many weapons caches in and around the capital city.
In one incident, Soldiers were approached by an Iraqi citizen who told them that a suspicious car was parked in his neighborhood. The Soldiers searched four men near the car identified by the citizen and found bomb-making materials.
While the U.S. troops questioned the car owners, they stopped and searched a fifth man who was acting suspiciously. The man's cell-phone history contained a message from another terrorist that roughly translated into "Thanks for the use of the rocket-propelled grenades."
Can terrorists really be that stupid? Yes they can. I wonder if this is one of the guys 'Abu Musab al-Zarqawi' was referring too here?
For more news from Iraq, read Centcom news briefs daily.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:46 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The guy with cell phone was definitely a liberal democrat from San Francisco.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2005 06:24 PM (M7kiy)
2
You beat me to it rooster, but I was going to say "blue stater". Damn you.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 29, 2005 07:16 PM (0yYS2)
3
The guy with the cellphone was a Klansman on Oxycontin.
Posted by: Downin Street memo at September 30, 2005 05:31 AM (A5eqb)
4
Gotta do the math on this one......... 100 terror suspects............ I am a litlle busy right now perhaps some of the analysts can taker over from the cheerleaders.I guess the first question would be from the movie "Casablanca" after Bogie killed the Nazi. Are these the usual suspects ? Now the math.....hmmmmm. lotta zeros which I could use exponents 2x 10 to the 4thany help on how to do expnents on a pc?
Posted by: john Ryan at September 30, 2005 10:58 AM (ads7K)
5
I see Downing Street Moron still bends over for the muslim hoard. Likes it. He does.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 30, 2005 09:13 PM (ywZa8)
6
Greyrooster:
HeHeHe! Yes, I think he does. LOL!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 30, 2005 09:57 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 27, 2005
Move Over CBS, al Qaeda Moves Into the News Business
On September 23rd the Islamic Media Front released a 16 minute news video on the internet called 'Sout al-Khalifa' or 'Voice of the Caliphate'. In recent months, al Qaeda in Iraq has accused al Jazeera of being too pro-Western. The Jawa Report has obtained a copy of the video. Images from it are posted below. Clips from the video can be seen at
MEMRI TV (about 4 minutes). If you need a copy of the entire video, please e-mail.
WAPO:
An Internet video newscast called the Voice of the Caliphate was broadcast for the first time on Monday, purporting to be a production of al Qaeda and featuring an anchorman who wore a black ski mask and an ammunition belt.
The anchorman, who said the report would appear once a week, presented news about the Gaza Strip and Iraq and expressed happiness about recent hurricanes in the United States. A copy of the Koran, the Muslim holy book, was placed by his right hand and a rifle affixed to a tripod was pointed at the camera....
The lead segment recounted Israel's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, which the narrator proclaimed as a "great victory," while showing Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia walking and talking among celebrating compatriots.
That was followed by a repeat of a pledge on Sept. 14 by Abu Musab Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, to wage all-out war on Iraq's Shiite Muslims. An image of Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born Sunni Muslim, remained on the screen for about half the broadcast.
The masked announcer also reported that a group called the Islamic Army in Iraq claimed to have launched chemical-armed rockets at American forces in Baghdad. A video clip showed five rockets fired in succession from behind a sand berm as an off-screen voice yelled "God is great" in Arabic. The Islamic Army asserted responsibility last year for the killing of Enzo Baldoni, an Italian journalist who had been kidnapped in Iraq.
A commercial break of sorts followed, which previewed a movie, "Total Jihad," directed by Mousslim Mouwaheed. The ad was in English, suggesting that the target audience might be Muslims living in Britain and the United States.
The final segment was about Hurricane Katrina. "The whole Muslim world was filled with joy" at the disaster, the anchorman said. He went on to say that President Bush was "completely humiliated by his obvious incapacity to face the wrath of God, who battered New Orleans, city of homosexuals." Hurricane Ophelia's brush with North Carolina was also mentioned.
More on the
Global Islamic Media Front from our archives.
Others: Captain Ed, James Joyner.
Images from the video below.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
10:53 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1154 words, total size 9 kb.
1
And now we go to Sayeed Mahmood Abusallam for the weather...Sayeed-
Sayeed: Today it will be hot as the fires of hell rains down on the infidel. Tonight, light winds from the East with the chance of a passing shower. Back to you Abu!
Abu: Thanks Sayeed. Earlier today the Infidels ran from our mighty warriors and pleaded for thier miserable lives. Small lakes were formed by their miserable tears which our brave freedom fighters washed their underthings in.
Also in the news, Cindy Sheehan has agreed to join the army of Allah. We will welcome her with a cold blade across her throat. Infidel Bitch.
And now for Sports with Sallami Baloney
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 27, 2005 01:06 PM (5ceWd)
2
you might want to put the Al Qaeda part in H1 tags, most people might confuse it with the average CNN/MSNBC/BBC newscast?
Posted by: dave at September 27, 2005 01:12 PM (CcXvt)
3
You guys ever see the mad TV skit where the middle east reporters all go
On to you saheed, Death to America.
Thanks Ali, Death to America.
that's all we have for tonight.
Good night, Peace be with you and Death to America.
Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2005 01:13 PM (D3+20)
4
will there be commericals?
you can have some fun with this one
Camel Cola to start
Posted by: hondo at September 27, 2005 01:20 PM (4Gtyc)
5
http://www.dailyrecycler.com/blog/2004/10/subtitles.html
Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2005 01:28 PM (D3+20)
6
what about sponsors people! This terror news won't pay for itself!
People let's focus here! Abu ! Good work on the weather. You forgot however to say "Death to America and the Jooooos" okay! Let's focus next time...otherwise good show people!
Now Sayeed. I want you to look angry when you do your reports! Strike fear people, thats the name of the game. Also, I want some color on your outfit next time m-kay.. We are not in the 50s here people. Okay, Im off to AllahBucks for a cafe creme double half caf. Whos with?
Posted by: ObSnooks at September 27, 2005 01:34 PM (5ceWd)
7
abu azzam has been killed.
# 2 man of "al qaeda in iraq"..woohoo!
Posted by: Billy at September 27, 2005 01:49 PM (dBEh9)
8
That's a good link Howie, and the video is priceless, but even funnier are the comments from... well, I haven't the words. The usual names just won't do for morons of that caliber!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 27, 2005 02:36 PM (0yYS2)
9
Do you mean the math man or the above slighty late and on the wrong thread comment that shows someone does not read the blog.
Posted by: Howie at September 27, 2005 02:45 PM (D3+20)
10
Well, both really, but mainly the blog comments. To read the crap these sub-geniuses were writing before the election is like getting caught in a weird time warp in which snowballs populate hell.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 27, 2005 05:51 PM (0yYS2)
11
"...a group called the Islamic Army in Iraq claimed to have launched chemical-armed rockets at American forces..."
I thought that Iraq didn't have WMD?
Posted by: Anthony Jagers at September 27, 2005 07:47 PM (9oivZ)
12
Whos that creep in the hood DAN RATHER or TOM BROKAW?
Posted by: sandpiper at September 27, 2005 08:43 PM (FpZEl)
13
Don't care. I will say that I pray that my beloved Marines will send him to visit Peter Jennings.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 28, 2005 08:58 AM (5ceWd)
14
It can't be Dan sandpiper, he's far too vain to let them cover his head, but that's probably the ONLY reason he doesn't have the job, because he's been on their payroll for years.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 28, 2005 09:07 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 26, 2005
Pfc. Lynndie England Convicted for Abu Ghraib Abuse
File this story under crimes that are blown way out of proportion by a left-leaning mainstream media.
From LATimes.com:
WASHINGTON -- Lynndie R. England, the Army private who became a grinning icon of Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse as she held a dog leash attached to a naked Iraqi detainee, was convicted today on six of seven charges at a military court martial.
She faces up to 10 years in a military prison. A sentencing hearing was scheduled for Tuesday at Ft. Hood, Texas, where her court martial trial was held.
[ ... ]
England, 22, was found guilty on one of two conspiracy charges, four counts of maltreating detainees, and one count of committing an indecent act. Conviction on all counts would have exposed her to at least 11 years imprisonment.
Military prosecutors considered her the so-called poster girl of the Abu Ghraib abuse, seen smiling and flashing her thumbs upward in numerous photos in which she posed in front of naked and bound male detainees.
England's defense attorneys contend that she was easily manipulated. Well, duh!
I think it's fairly obvious that she is also not too bright.
Unfortunately though, by being stupid she became the pivot point for an international scandal. Consequently, she'll probably get hammered for something that's criminal but hardly the level of major crimes. Hell, there are female child abusers, arguably more serious criminals, that get off with probation. England will surely get significant cell time.
Companion post at Interested-Participant.
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
11:24 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Do you think this will make the left happy? Or any other convictions of those who abused the detainees? Absolutely not. Until they recover the taped conversation where Bush himself told her to do any of that, they will not be happy. And the media won't help. They've focused on England to the exclusion of all else so people get the impression she is the only one charged.
England was obviously guilty, as were others, and they'll get a fair trial just like anyone else. But the "lock her up and throw away the key" crowd talk out of the other side of their mouths rooting for the release of Mumia, Lynne Stewart and various others who have been convicted of crimes as well.
Posted by: Oyster at September 27, 2005 07:20 AM (YudAC)
2
I have no problem with dragging the terrorists around by a leash.This woman should be given a handshake and a job at arbys.
Get down on their level and fight it out in the gutter. It is the only thing they understand. They are either at your throats or at your feet. There is no middle ground. Put a leash on em, let the dogs at em, take happy snaps while you stack em.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 27, 2005 08:28 AM (5ceWd)
3
no one seems to understand that, Filthy...the ME has such a culture, that by the US and coalition troops fighting "nice" that these terrorists see it as a weakness....yes, the US armed forces are winning there is no doubt, but at too slow a pace, because they follow too many p.c. rules and its bullshit...im not saying that the US forces should torture and cut off heads, but when fighting these terrorists who will do anything, anything at all to kill American forces, maybe its time to show less mercy to these terrorists in combat...yes, try and capture the ones we know are the leaders who may have needed info, but the rank and file terrorists should be flat out killed in combat, dont even bother to capture them...what for???...so they can crowd into the holding camps so they can make trouble, cause riots and attempt to escape so they can kill more Iraqi citizens and American soldiers....embarass the hell out of them, kick their asses all over Iraq, annihilate them, so no mercy to the terrorists, make an example of them that are there and maybe the rest will stop coming if they see that as soon as they get into Iraq, the US forces wipe them out like cockroaches...the more mercy we show, the more likely they will come as they will see us as weak and soft....read a book on their culture and you will see how correct that is....Alexander the Great knew how to deal with them and he had very few problems and when a problem did come up he dealt with it swiftly not as slow as the US and coalition forces seem to do...sometimes it doesnt pay to be nice
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 27, 2005 09:13 AM (FMsU7)
4
PC is destroying the country right before our eyes. People need to wake up before it is too late. What would the MSM say today if Bush took the fight to the terrorists the way Truman did in WWII. WE have 21 century weapons and our fighting 17 century warfare. Why do we spend billions for our development on weapons to sit idol during conflict? Not saying we should nuke, but the Sunni Triangle should have been dust over a year ago. Bush needs to wake up, the MSM is never going to like him so get over it. Do what is right for our brave men and women and kill these radical Islamic bastards. I believe in the fight, not the way it is being fought!
Posted by: Andy Driggers at September 27, 2005 09:36 AM (tMU4W)
5
Would be nice if we would start here in our own communities. The left needs to be fought as hard as the terrorists. They are the enemy from within.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 27, 2005 10:26 AM (5ceWd)
6
England was a disgrace to her uniform along with her sad sack crew, and the worse nightmare to a Senior NCO. We expect people to perform their duties and job with minimum supervision - its out of mutual respect! After that incident, the Chain tightens up on everyone - looking over ever shoulder - second and third guessing every action ... a supervisor's nightmare, and hell for everyone! I don't give a damn about those prisoners - I do give a damn about all those above who had to suffer the grief she and her band of misfits caused.
Posted by: hondo at September 27, 2005 10:58 AM (4Gtyc)
7
Sounds like the corruption goes all the way to the top.
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/HRW/bbc29fb371b02011e16942345387f497.htm
Posted by: l at September 27, 2005 11:14 AM (BmtfW)
8
WOW l!
Another bloated self-righteous news "expose" about events circa 03/04 without "ONE SINGLE NAMED SOURCE OR WITNESS, NOR ANY CONFORMATION OR VERIFICATION OF ANY KIND"! You expect to be taken seriously - then expect again.
Posted by: hondo at September 27, 2005 11:41 AM (4Gtyc)
9
I have to agree with Thanos and Andy. PC is killing us. Look at what the MSM and left did when Al Jazeera reported that the "Infidels" bombed a wedding party in Afghanistan. It was a lie, but you didn't hear a retraction on the MSM or from the left.
Another example is just this past month. The number of dead in the SuperDome. It was 6. 4 from natural causes. 1 from drugs and 1 an apparent suicide. Yet just Saturday one of the wacko left at the anti-war rally stated that dozens died in the SuperDome. So not only is PC killing us, so it the perpetuation of lies in the media.
I'm sure the Lyndie England and her co-horts probably did humiliate the prisoners and should be punished, but do not paint all the soldiers with that same brush! And MSM and lefties...stop lying about it! (wishful thinking, I know)
Posted by: Anna at September 27, 2005 12:57 PM (nVvoC)
10
"Another bloated self-righteous news "expose" about events circa 03/04 without "ONE SINGLE NAMED SOURCE OR WITNESS, NOR ANY CONFORMATION OR VERIFICATION OF ANY KIND"! You expect to be taken seriously - then expect again."
Hmmm, your description sounds more like all the crap thats on foxnews. Ignoring the truth wont make it go away. Now, off to bed little fascist!
Posted by: Sad But True at September 27, 2005 05:49 PM (BmtfW)
11
It true when you respond with verifiable fact - not lame commentary. Try again.
Posted by: hondo at September 27, 2005 06:28 PM (4Gtyc)
12
SBT,
You're full of it and you know it. Take your stupid commentary over to Kos, where you dopeheads can get together and come up with some more lies. You're pathetic.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 27, 2005 08:27 PM (rUyw4)
13
boo-hoo... you really got me mr.joe. i can't compete with intellectuals like you. you know it all and i know nothing. in truth, you are a small fish in a smaller pond (which is getting smaller by the day). who is pathetic? your life is confined to posting comments on here, spouting off the same old crap the right always do. commie-this, dopehead-that, terrorist-this, traitor-that. where does that kind of rhetoric take us? down the same toilet from where your mentality comes from. get a life. you probably have trouble sleeping at night because people with opposing views are posting on your precious site, you seethe with anger, your mind no longer has the ability to listen to the truth or opposing ideas, you can't get the thoughts of liberals out of your head. all because you must post the knock-out punch to anyone who is different than you. and oh yeah, because you are being proven wrong on a daily basis. you are a big zero.
Posted by: Sad But True at September 28, 2005 12:05 AM (6VX9y)
14
Look there is enough blame for EVERYONE.and remember the main idea I think is to not make any more enemies. we already ahve plenty.
Posted by: john Ryan at September 28, 2005 03:24 PM (ads7K)
15
SBT
Expect again. Where's the beef for your original comment? This isn't a Dance Club - your gonna have to do a lot better than that.
Posted by: hondo at September 28, 2005 03:52 PM (4Gtyc)
16
England was punished for what the enemy would consider appropriate behavior. America couldn't be serious if it punishes its soldier for embarassing the enemy.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 28, 2005 06:33 PM (6krEN)
17
I will also add that I think England is a simple minded, moralless little tramp who puts out for the troops. Why do we allow types like her to be in the military anyway? The end result. The taxpayers will now pay for her imprisonment, her attorneys and welfare for her illegitimate child for the next 18 years. Perhaps longer.
Who loses? The average American who goes to work every day and pays his taxes, doesn't receive welfare or aid to dependant children, or free hospitalization, or section 8 housing, etc. etc. No one reallly loses but us.
Posted by: greyrooster at September 29, 2005 11:52 PM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 22, 2005
Iraqi Journalist Murdered
(Mosul, Iraq) Another Iraqi journalist has been killed, bringing the total number of murdered journalists to
over 40 since counting began in March 2003.
From AlertNet.org:
A journalist from Radio Nineveh was gunned down on Wednesday night in Mosul, 390 km (240 miles) north of Baghdad. Hospital and police sources said Ahlam Younnis was driving in a car with her husband, who was also killed, and her son, who was wounded in the attack.
In the past week, two other journalists were also
killed in Mosul. Firas Maadidi, Mosul bureau chief for
As-Saffir newspaper and chief editor of the daily
Al-Masar was gunned down, and Hind Ismail,
As-Saffir reporter, was found with a single gun shot to her head.
These were brave people murdered by criminals. Yet the mainstream media (MSM) continue to characterize these heinous crimes as valueless deaths by sanitized 'insurgents.' Where's the outrage? These people were journalists! Civilians doing their jobs! And, all along, the MSM ignore the horrible crimes and avoid attaching responsibility to any group other than the nebulous ill-defined 'insurgency.'
more...
Posted by: Mike Pechar at
10:15 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 309 words, total size 2 kb.
1
An excellent point. Van Gogh redux. From another chattering class. Where are those journos who were decrying U.S. "assassinations" of journalists? What is the principle they stand for? Evidently it is not press freedom. The principle is opposition to the U.S.
Posted by: slickdpdx at September 22, 2005 11:22 AM (MjGRu)
2
Oh dear, you are just raging to the choir... It reminds me of the part of the book Watership Downs when the intrepid band of rabbits come across a very healthy and well fed colony of fellow rabbits. Only problem was that some left the hutch and never came back but, they never speak of it because, after all, the ones that remain are still healthy and well fed...
Posted by: babs at September 22, 2005 11:44 AM (hrGMt)
Posted by: Howie at September 22, 2005 03:54 PM (D3+20)
4
That's just how them rabbits are.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 22, 2005 04:01 PM (rUyw4)
5
Well over here in blighty it made the news. As mike said "These people were jounalists. Civillians doing their job" However when two Reuters journalists were killed by US troops their deaths were almost lauded. In fact they were lauded. Double standards, dont you just love them.
Posted by: conor at September 23, 2005 03:39 AM (4PPsx)
6
Conor,
"Over here in blighty it made the news". Well, ok, how much criticism was evoked at the "Michael Moore Minutemen" for the murder of these two journalists. Hmm...I can see it now. It was all the fault of Chimpy McBushhalihitlerBurton.
That's what I thought. Yep, them double standards are hell!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 23, 2005 04:11 PM (rUyw4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 15, 2005
Terrorists Shoot Down U.S. Plane in Iraq
A terror organization in Iraq, Jaish al-Rashideen, has posted a video in which it claims to have shot down a U.S. airplane. Images from the video below.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
10:45 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 68 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh my god I hope the tiny pilot is OK. I hope they don't smurf his head off.
Posted by: Howie at September 15, 2005 10:53 AM (D3+20)
2
Oh! the Humanity!
I can barely look at all the broken G.I Joe's laying around dying at the feet of the mighty
Mujahadeen.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 10:54 AM (CcXvt)
3
Note there is no damage to the tiny plane except there is some duct tape holding the wings on which probably come off on landing anyway so they don't break. I think it ran out of fuel or charge and just got picked up.
Posted by: Howie at September 15, 2005 11:03 AM (D3+20)
4
I guess they got tired of looking in awe at the glass Coca-Cola bottle that used to sit on that pedestal.
Posted by: JohnMc at September 15, 2005 11:30 AM (y+I+a)
5
Is this part of the terrorists' shock and awe campaign? Because I'm in shock at how lame and awful they are.
Does making fun of terrorists count as making headway on the war on terror?
Posted by: lawhawk at September 15, 2005 11:39 AM (AcoYr)
6
That aircrsft looks much more like a UAV. Are you sure your arabic translation? It is more likely mechanical failure than a shootdown.
Posted by: raver dave at September 15, 2005 11:51 AM (XTKFt)
7
Yeah it looks like a UAV. I guess liberals will be disappointed that a pilot wasn't killed or captured.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 12:18 PM (0yYS2)
8
They "shot" it down? Where's the damage from what ever they shot it with or from the, surely, "crash" landing?
Here it is to scale
In other news, the Islamofascists have finally developed, after decades of research and development,
their own version of the UAV.
Posted by: Oyster at September 15, 2005 12:39 PM (fl6E1)
9
No, it's a UAV. They do claim they shot it down. But, that's kind of the whole point of the post.......
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 15, 2005 12:41 PM (JQjhA)
10
When I was a kid, I'd put firecrackers on my model planes, maybe that's what they're doing.
Posted by: Tim at September 15, 2005 12:42 PM (QrELf)
11
Can't you all see, this war orchestrated by KKKarl Rove is not worth all this loss of plastic and metal! Pounds and pounds of government products that could have supported the leeves in NO. Bush and Company are the biggest murderers blah blah blah...
Posted by: Wine-aholic at September 15, 2005 12:50 PM (Wsn+K)
12
Rusty, you should have titled your piece, "Terrorists shoot down model airplane, or maybe they went to Wal-Mart and bought one". Because this ain't no airplane.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 15, 2005 05:25 PM (q9AWQ)
13
did the brave lions of Allah shoot it down with a slingshot???....
Posted by: THANOS35 at September 15, 2005 05:34 PM (FMsU7)
14
I think we have some images of the pilot of that "plane". Wizbang has more
http://wizbangblog.com/archives/004955.php
Posted by: packetninja at September 16, 2005 08:21 AM (1uomX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 14, 2005
Al Qaeda on the Run in Northern Iraq
Are things really all that bad in Iraq? Not according to those that are actually there. In a Pentagon press briefing today, a commander from Mosul, Iraq, described a much weakened al Qaeda presence in that region. At least 80% of al Qaeda fighters are dead or captured, and those fighting today are much less organized with far poorer training.
But how can things be getting better in Iraq when so much news--today's news--always seems so bad?
Flipping through the news this morning as I got ready for work, I noticed that CNN and Fox were reporting some very bad news from people who should know how things are going, reporters in Baghdad. However, one thing seemed rather odd to me--both reporters had the same background shot.
In fact, both reporters were at the same Baghdad hotel well inside the Green Zone. So, how are they getting their news? They are getting their news from the DOD just like I am, only they can broadcast their original news from Iraq and thus you get the feeling that they are more authoritative because they are, you know, there, even though there isn't really anywhere near where the stories are happening.
Journalists such as Michael Yon are the exception to the rule. He's embedded with military forces in Mosul, so when Yon reports that things are much better in Mosul today than last year, you better believe him. Yon is actually there where there is.
So, when Army Col. Robert B. Brown, commander of the 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division's Stryker Brigade Combat Team, reported from Mosul, Iraq, about conditions there you better listen, too. Remember, Yon is embedded with these guys. Stryker Brigade News has a great gallery of the men of the 1/25 here.
Here are some highlights from a DOD press release about Brown's conference. And by 'highlights', I mean pretty much the whole press release. But, as you read it, imagine that I am reporting from inside the Green Zone. I'm sure that will make it much more believable. Here's a visual, to help put you in the mood.
Brown notes that eighty percent of al Qaeda's network in northern Iraq "has been devastated" since January due to the capture or killing of key leaders and the outrage of Iraqi citizens.
The situation in Mosul is "improving on a daily basis," Brown said. "Normalcy has come back into the city."
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
05:21 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 786 words, total size 6 kb.
1
And then there is Baghdad...
Posted by: Ariya at September 14, 2005 08:08 PM (noCGr)
2
Yes, we'll always have Baghdad, but'cha can't go back to Constantinople!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 14, 2005 10:27 PM (0yYS2)
3
As you know the greatest casualty in war is the truth. Propaganda wil be churned out on a daily basis by all sides. The mainstream media whom are treated with absolute derision in this blog and others, are accused of having an anti Bush and an anti war agenda. Yet you favour reading official Government Defense Dept presss briefings to independent accounts from international news agencies. Has it not occurred to that the few select journalists actually with the army might be there for one reason and one reason alone, that is, report on what the government wants to be reported? Personally I would prefer to read the MSM even if at times it is incorrect,than read what the government wants me to read.
It is one thing to read something which is incorrect, it is another to read state spun lies.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 04:44 AM (4PPsx)
4
Why do so many people think Michael Yon is a reputable source for information? Did it ever cross your mind that what he reports is first filtered through the US military censors? What he reports is just as sanitized as what the Pentagon feeds the reporters hiding in the Green Zone.
The casualty counts speak for themselves.
Posted by: OB Kenobi at September 15, 2005 05:10 AM (p8hE4)
5
I think more people would be open to the news from the mainstream media, if it were not one sided, everything is a disaster,with no progress made and "insurgents" in every ally.
The fact is that centcom and other military sources regularly make press releases about the rebuilding effort, about new schools, hospital repairs, individual units that have donated to causes to benefit the Iraqi people -- the msm ignore them and put out the latest threat from AQ in Iraq, or the story about "lawlessness" in city's overwhelmed by "insurgents"
I find it amusing that somehow you believe that international press are in Iraq for altruistic reasons, but the military press, well they're just Government mouth pieces? I think this blog has proven time and time again that the msm is one sided, even down to the google news article the other day that listed numerous success stories in Iraq that the military had published, not one had been picked up by any news outlet in google news.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 06:49 AM (CcXvt)
6
So Dave
Whether you beleive it or not, Iraq is in a state of war, with atrocities being committed on a daily basis if not an hourly basis. Do you honestly think people will be fooled into thinking that things are going swimmingly well because allied troops have opened a hospital or are seen receiving a warm welcome by some villagers in an area say untouched by the fighting? Come on, smarten up, the real issues are the suicide bombs, the loss of life, the destruction.
Accusing the MSM of bias is a bit rich! How do you think blogs get their news if not the MSM? Look at the posts and you will see that most acknowledge the source, i.e a major news agency. The blogger's narration is just his spin.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 07:23 AM (4PPsx)
7
Actually Conor, what I believe is when the "boots on the ground" say that things are getting better in Iraq, and that significant progress is being made. There are numerous blogs that focus on stories from soldiers.
It seems however, you prefer to believe the reporters in their "Ivory towers" inside the relatively safe "greenzone" hotels have some better prospective? well I guess enough of them have hired people with links to terrorists to film footage for them -- so I guess point taken.
The homicide bombings are now at the point, where they mainly target civilians and Iraqi security forces, this is eventually weaking the support for the insurgency, even the Sunni's are beginning to get tired of it.
The focus is now on making the Iraqi security forces autonomous so they can deal with the terrorists themselves, they're also attempting to bring the weaker insurgents (nationals, non-baathists) to the political arena, while rooting the hardliners out of every safe haven they flee to. While the "back" of the Insurgency is not broken, it is obvious that the terrorists are now losing support from the people that once concealed them, now their relative safety comes from grouping together in border towns, rather than the strongholds they once held inside the Sunni triangle (Fallujah/Mosul/Najaf/etc.)
If you're not seeing progress, I'm not sure what I can say to point out the obvious.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 08:25 AM (CcXvt)
8
Given the political climate, it is highly unlikely that you will read anything unsavoury about the war. I sincerely doubt that any soldier, rank or file is going to say anything that would counter the official line
However I am willing to concede that a vast number of the terrorists have been annihilated. Targetting the civillian population instead of the Allied forces is a sign of their desperation, but like an injured animal they will become more deadly. There seems to be no shortage of suicide bombers and to think that the threat is lessening is allowing yourself to fall into a false sense of security.
I dont believe for one moment that the administration is discounting the threat of the terrorists. In fact they might be more worried about further terrorist atrocities.
But the reportage of the war is always going to be a contentious issue. You read the news and make your own mind up. Or you accept what you're told by your leaders.
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 08:56 AM (4PPsx)
9
When was the last time Fallujah was in the news?
My only dispute with the report is the 80% number. 80% of what? I have a hard time believing they have a good enough idea on the total number of terrorists in Iraq.
That said, we are making real progress in Iraq.
Posted by: Marcus Aurelius at September 15, 2005 09:08 AM (ERx6z)
10
Conor:
The fact is the MSM "doom and gloom" reporting potrays that there is no
good news from Iraq -- ever.
There is news of homicide bombings, ambushes, kidnappings and the like, but never the same airtime discussion is given to capture, or killing of terrorists, or their leaders, or even some of the good things that do happen in Iraq.
This causes the fear of uncertainty, and potrays Iraq as a Kennedy like "Quagmire", with the deaths of soldiers, civilians and contractors achieving nothing -- this undermines the War effort, I often hear the words of insurgents propaganda releases, more than I hear a command element discussing the War on the News.
I do not discount the terrorists, I believe the threat is not over, not even close but studies of Insurgency find the hardest part of breaking it, is the local support for insurgents --The terrorists themselves seem to be taking care of that by killing civilians enmass.
The problems that are left are cutting terrorist supply lines, while maintaining our own, destroying safe havens and establishing safety for the citizens.
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 10:03 AM (CcXvt)
11
It kills me how the leftards come on here and post their idiocy expecting to convince anyone of anything. Here's a tip, morons; not only are you not going to convince anyone with a brain with your idiotic, treasonous propaganda, you're only making things worse for yourselves. Especially you cocksuckers who automatically think that anything any military person says is a lie. Let me tell you worthless little shits something; one soldier is worth more than all of you combined, and the sooner you are all taken out and shot, the better. How you think you will be able to get away with taking the side of the enemy is beyond me; you are all traitors and pretty soon things are going to go very badly for you. Don't waste your time here, because your childish lies won't get you anywhere with us.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 10:06 AM (0yYS2)
12
Well Dave, I dont news what you get, but over here in London we get plenty of news. Good news and bad news.
Improbulus Maximus
Great post! When you learn to conduct yourself in an adult manner perhaps I will engage you in a debate. Until then take your cretinous remarks to another blog where they would be more appreciated. Have you considered changing your handle to Ignoramus Maximus? Beleive it would be more apt you pathetic little irk
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 10:22 AM (4PPsx)
13
Well Dave, I dont news what you get, but over here in London we get plenty of news. Good news and bad news.
Improbulus Maximus
Great post! When you learn to conduct yourself in an adult manner perhaps I will engage you in a debate. Until then take your cretinous remarks to another blog where they would be more appreciated. Have you considered changing your handle to Ignoramus Maximus? Beleive it would be more apt you pathetic little irk
Posted by: Conor at September 15, 2005 10:23 AM (4PPsx)
14
Conor:
If it's anything like the reporting I saw from the Daily Mail on the Hurricane, I find it hard to believe the U.K press is any different!
Posted by: dave at September 15, 2005 10:43 AM (CcXvt)
15
I don't want to engage you in debate you piece of shit, I want to see you bleed out slowly.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 15, 2005 12:21 PM (0yYS2)
16
Ignoramus Maximus
What's wrong? Watching too many action movies? " I want to see you bleed slowly" Wow, I can see that you were a clever little boy at school, not!. Maybe you're a girl, because you bitch like best of them.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 02:16 AM (4PPsx)
17
Ignoramus Maximus
What's wrong? Watching too many action movies? " I want to see you bleed slowly" Wow, I can see that you were a clever little boy at school, not!. Maybe you're a girl, because you bitch like best of them.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 02:16 AM (4PPsx)
18
Dave
The Daily Mail is a tabloid rag. The other papers in the UK, both left and right wing were equally critical of the official response to the hurricane.
Posted by: Conor at September 16, 2005 09:21 AM (4PPsx)
19
So, Joseph Conor, do you think that you can't be found? Do you think that your muslim boyfriend will keep you safe? Tell me, does he do you before or after his goat, or does he make you blow the goat after he's done with it? You're a disgusting little dhimmi bitch, and I hope the next 'slamotard bomber gets you.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 16, 2005 10:03 AM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Terrorists Murder Over 100 Civilians in Iraq
Terrorists in Iraq has claimed responsibility for a series of bombings that killed over 100 civilians in Iraq today. Reports from the scene conflict as to the actual total of people killed in today's mass murder spree, but a single car bomb is said to have killed at least 88 and wounded 227 in a mostly Shi'ite neighborhood of Baghdad.
Media reports indicate that al Jazeera is reporting that al Qaeda has claimed responsibility for the mass murders. No specific claim, though has been made, but al Qaeda may have alluded to the deadly attacks:
The conquest of revenge for the Sunni people of Tal Afar has started," Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al-Qaida Organisation in the Land of Two Rivers said in the statement, whose authenticity could not be verified.
It said its "brigades" had launched a series of attacks, led by its elite "martyrdom-seeking" brigade.
The statement did not claim responsibility for any of the suicide bombings, only promising to "release more (details), God willing, as soon as news comes in of the operations in Baghdad and other cities".
Such statements are an almost daily occurence from the terror organization. It would not be beneath al Jazeera, though, to report in their Arab language broadcast that al Qaeda had claimed the attack and then changed the story for their English versionn.
Reports are mixed, but between five and ten more bombs targetting civilians were heard around Baghdad this morning.
Elsewhere, gunmen entered a village, rounded up those suspected of 'collaboration' and murdered them.
Gunmen wearing military uniforms, meanwhile, surrounded a village north of Baghdad early Wednesday and killed 17 men, police said.
Police Lt. Waleed al-Hayali, in Taji, 10 miles north of Baghdad, said the gunmen detained the victims after searching the village. They were handcuffed, blindfolded and shot. The dead included one policeman and others who worked as drivers and construction workers for the U.S. military, said al-Hayali. [source]
These reports come as Iraqi troops, with U.S. backing, take control of al Qaeda safe havens along the Syrian border.
Posted by: Rusty at
08:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 3 kb.
1
They kill in the name of Islam and we go and build a monument to Islam. Great.
Islam, is evil. All of it. All you "Muslims" in the US better get right with God and plan to open X-mas presents this year otherwise, we will turn on you.
Posted by: filthy allah at September 14, 2005 08:15 AM (5ceWd)
2
The era of the car bomb is comming to an end.
This looks like the terrorists are throwing the deep pass on fourth down before the clock runs out.
Posted by: Dave K at September 14, 2005 11:13 AM (vvaFL)
3
Michael Moore's "freedom fighters" at work.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 14, 2005 03:46 PM (q9AWQ)
4
Well at least they're not White Christians, so Howard Dean must like them.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 14, 2005 07:34 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 13, 2005
Chemical Attack in Iraq?
There is no confirmation of the report, only a claim made by a group. If they actually used chemical weapons, they were ineffective as no injuries were reported from the attack on the Green Zone. The same group had
threatened to use chemical weapons on Sept. 11th.
SITE:
In a statement issued today, September 13, 2005, The Victorious Army Group, [Jeish al-Ta'eifa al-Mansoura], claims to have fired chemical rockets today at several targets in Baghdad, including the Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Green Zone, and the Security Academy. According to the message, the explosions “shook the whole capital Baghdad,” and ambulances were seen carrying away the dead of the “converters.” The group indicates: “Here are the mujahideen rockets hitting the converters’ dens as a response to the evil thing done by them in Tal Afar.”
What bodies?
AKI:
For the first time, terrorists linked to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi are claiming to have struck the Iraqi capital Baghdad with chemical weapons. The claim was made in a statement published on the Internet by Islamic group al-Taifa Mansura (The Victorious Side) which is part of the al-Qaeda network and close to its Iraqi representative, al-Zarqawi.
As we reported earlier, the group responsible is not related to al Qaeda, even though various media reports make the claim.
See this from al Qaeda.
The same group last Sunday threatened to attack the Green Zone in Baghdad with missiles containing chemical warheads unless the Americans halted the ongoing offensive against the city of Telafar.
A short while ago, in a second statement the group claimed responibility for missile attacks on central Baghdad from 8.30am till 10am local time on Tuesday morning. The message alleged that chemical weapons hit the interior ministry, the foreign ministry and the American training school which is also located in the heavily fortified Green Zone....
The firing of five rockets was confirmed by an Islamic site close to the Baathist-inspired guerrillas - islammemo - which referred to at least four rockets with chemical warheads. The site, which tends to publish unreliable biased news reports, celebrates it as the first chemical attack in Iraq."
With recent news that the
US might respond to the use of WMD with a nuclear strike, now would be a good time for Syria and Iran to rethink their present course of supporting the terrorists.
Others: In The Bullpen
Posted by: Rusty at
01:23 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 3 kb.
1
How about responding in kind. We are spendign millions destroying these horrid weapons. Would it not be more cost effective to show Zaqueery and his bunch what real chem weapons can do. No wouldn't be prudent as W sr. used to say.
Posted by: Howie at September 13, 2005 01:36 PM (D3+20)
2
You know Mahmood, doing a "poo finger" on each rocket does not make it a WMD.
You got to try a little harder. NOW GET BACK OUT THERE AND GIVE ME YOUR BEST!!!
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 13, 2005 01:38 PM (5ceWd)
Posted by: Oyster at September 13, 2005 01:51 PM (fl6E1)
4
Chemical warheads do not make explosions. Heat and shock of an explosion tend to destroy the chemicals, defeating the purpose. Instead, chem warheads tend to have very small charges intended to spread their contents around or even just make sure their cases are open.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at September 13, 2005 01:57 PM (n5eDP)
5
Didn't you hear, there are no WMD in Iraq. Cindy Sheehan said so.
Posted by: The Man at September 13, 2005 02:02 PM (EDlAL)
6
Actually Mr. Crawford, there is a minor explosion. More of a "POP" really. The dispersal of a chemical munition is a complex occurance when attached to a mortar or a bomb lets say. A bomb on the road side would probably destroy the chemical. A mortar could be fitted to disperse a chem weapon but I doubt Sayeed and Abu in their underground lab can manage to properly assemble a legitmate dispersal mechanism to attach to the mortar. Yes, It can be done under circumstances that don't involve running and dodging bullets but, Sayeed and Abu are not in those circumstances.
I think that they have resorted to the "Poo finger" method of dispersing their own individual chemical biological weapon. This is much easier. Sayeed would after a large dinner of dal,curry & lamb soaked in ghee...dig his index finger in his o-ring up to the first knuckle. Sayeed then, whilst holding the dirty digit in the air, walk over to the morters and then "wipe" the darkend digit on to the morter to be fired at the infidel at a later date. Then, Sayeed would go on the net and announce he "Poo fingered" the morters thus striking fear and disgust in our troops.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 13, 2005 02:44 PM (5ceWd)
7
Cont:
THis method of "poo finger" Wmd does backfire. The types of food Sayeed is required to eat to create the proper "Poo finger" athmosphere Could in fact create a condition called PSA or, Porn Star Ass from continued bouts in the privy.
I am not sure if you have seen a porno that includes lots of back door action.... but if you have, you know what PSA is. For those that don't, I will try now to show you.
It is a "O" instead of an "x"
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 13, 2005 02:49 PM (5ceWd)
8
This is also known as the 'Mall Rats' WMD.......
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 13, 2005 03:00 PM (JQjhA)
9
The statement "The site, which tends to publish unreliable biased news reports, ..." was referring to Reuters, Â… right?
Posted by: Don Miguel at September 13, 2005 04:01 PM (+KixN)
10
Respond in time lets use luaghing gas on them and allow them to lighten up
Posted by: sandpiper at September 13, 2005 08:31 PM (g0rz7)
11
Actually Mr. Crawford, there is a minor explosion. More of a "POP" really.
Isn't that what I said? I wrote:
Instead, chem warheads tend to have very small charges intended to spread their contents around or even just make sure their cases are open.
My point was there's nowhere near enough to shake anything, let alone an entire city.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at September 13, 2005 08:55 PM (Gn9tM)
12
However, you failed to mention anything about "Poofinger" so, you must be an idiot.
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 13, 2005 09:01 PM (bikuR)
13
If any type of NBC attack occurred in the BD Green Zone there is almost a 100% chance that there would have been confirmation by now. This would be big news. It would be a justification for continued presence in Iraq. In addition to that there are many special interest groups who would benefit any type of NBC attack however so small, even if it was a complete failure. Deploying such weapons with any effect requires some skill. I do not see how an attack of this sort could be kept secret for more than a few hours. It could be that they through some household cleaners over the wall and the only way to find the chems is to look for a clean spot.
Posted by: Nelson at September 17, 2005 04:41 AM (S783J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 12, 2005
Staying the Course in Iraq
Dean Esmay has an excellent post on the moral argument for staying the course in Iraq:
With some moral arguments, there really is no middle ground. I'd like to think there is but there isn't. So my suggestion--as "black and white" as it may sound--is simple: take a stand. Do you want to abandon those people in Iraq or do you not? Do we turn them over to the "freedom fighters" who bomb women and children and mosques and cops and elected politicians as well as our soldiers? Or do we protect the victims of those "freedom fighters," recognizing the "freedom fighters" as vicious fascist thugs and theocratic nutjobs, and try to help the real people, the overwhelming majority of the Iraqi people, establish a democratic, human rights respecting, and free nation?
I fully support Dean's argument. The time for debating a war, any war, is before it begins. Once it begins the only debate ought to be how to win it in the quickest manner. That is the duty of a patriot.
Further, I believe the war must be won for pragmatic and Realist (I mean this in the foreign policy school of thought sense) reasons. If we do not set up a government that will be allied with the U.S. in Iraq then we will be sending a signal to jihadi forces that terrorism works. Remember, Osama bin Laden first began to believe that America was weak and could be defeated after our retreat from Somalia.
The Left's freedom fighters who we are fighting in Iraq are intent on setting up a Taliban-like state. If they succeed, then not only has the cause of freedom been set back, but the cause of America as well.
Posted by: Rusty at
05:44 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 295 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Once it begins the only debate ought to be how to win it in the quickest manner."
By staying or going.
Also, there is a problem with your 'time to talk is over.' We now have more information than before. We now know more about what was known before. So its really a different conversation than before.
Posted by: actus at September 12, 2005 11:34 PM (y/f3P)
2
There will be no ultimate win for us in Iraq, because to win would be to lose. Well, I'll put it a little less cryptically. Were we, rather than the Iraqi forces, to win against the insurgency then Iraq would end up as the same kind of "protectorate" that it was under British rule in the last century. So, in order to establish the legitimacy of something more substancial than an American colony the "freedom fighters" have to defeat the "insurgents." That will establish Iraq as a nation, and just about nothing else will.
And by the time all of this transpires in the way that it ought, the US will be out of the picture almost entirely. It has to be.
Consider that it was the War of 1812, and not the American Revolution, that really established the United States as a nation. And it was during that war, while watching the battle in Baltimore Harbor, that Key wrote
The Star Spangled Banner.
Posted by: Demosophist at September 13, 2005 02:18 AM (QKEx7)
3
"That will establish Iraq as a nation, and just about nothing else will."
Right. They will have purchased their OWN identity. Hence GW's words "When Iraq stands up, we'll stand down."
They will have to finish this war.
Posted by: Oyster at September 13, 2005 05:49 AM (YudAC)
4
Bushraq is a cluster and muddy boots sojias OUT!!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 13, 2005 08:27 AM (VhNDM)
5
Right. They will have purchased their OWN identity. Hence GW's words "When Iraq stands up, we'll stand down." They will have to finish this war.
Well, that part's tricky. If we leave too late there will be no, or an insufficient, transfer of legitimacy. Remember Pantani's reaction when Lance gave him the victory on
Mont Ventoux. Nations act that way as well. And if we leave too early, of course, the Iraqi "freedom fighters" won't be ready to defeat the "insurgents" and we'll have another failed state on our hands.
So far I haven't seen anyone on the Left or the Right make this argument, because it requires a kind of judgment that neither is very familiar with. But I maintain that Americans will know what to do when the time comes. It's in our genes.
Posted by: Demosophist at September 13, 2005 09:36 AM (hoJy0)
6
Is Dean the only sane Liberal left?
Posted by: Howie at September 13, 2005 11:29 AM (D3+20)
7
Howard Dean? Huh? You're kidding, right? The only sane democrat that comes to mind for me is Zell Miller.
Posted by: Oyster at September 13, 2005 04:16 PM (fl6E1)
8
No I meant Dean Esmay. He says he is liberal I just assumed he was a Democrat. I meant liberal as in sane liberal. you know about assume it makes an ass of U and me.
http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/000052.html
Posted by: Howie at September 13, 2005 04:43 PM (D3+20)
9
But Howie Dean might be fun to get really drunk with at least he has personality. yeeeeaaaahhhh.
Posted by: Howie at September 13, 2005 05:11 PM (D3+20)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Zarqawi on the Run, Accuses US of Using Chemical Weapons
In a new audio tape from al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al Zarqawi accuses US forces of using 'poison gas' in its offensive on Tel Afar.
The audio of the tape is available here (scroll to Sept. 12th, second link).
Some Arab and hardcore Leftist presses have often repeated the claim that the U.S. is using chemical, biological, and even nuclear weapons in Iraq. [related story here]
Zaraqawi's audio speeches have often come at times when it appeared that al Qaeda was on the run. This tape comes as US forces have launched an all out offensive against al Qaeda in Iraq, with a large measure of success. A similar audio tape emerged after reports that Zarqawi had been shot and after the fall of Fallujah to U.S. forces. Both tapes promised the immenent defeat of the U.S. at a time when al Qaeda was on the run.
On the audiotape, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is heard to say:
The Crusaders mobilised their big armies and used the most destructive and lethal weapons and the most deadly and hurtful poison gas together with their stooges. But God made them drink at the hands of the mujahedeen the different kinds of death and made them face horrible things that they will never forget. [source]
Zarqawi is also heard urging his fighters to be prepared for 'a final battle' with the Americans who he calls 'cowards'. Even though it is al Qaeda that uses the tactics of hit and run attacks, IEDs, murdering hostages, beheading, and hiding among the civilian population, Zarqawi is heard calling US forces 'cowards who always seek to run away."
Tel Afar is now controlled by the Coalition troops and al Qaeda forces are reported to have fled the city. Who was it that ran away Zarqawi?
SITE has a partial translation here, in which Zarqawi claims that hurricane Katrina was an act of Allah brought about by the prayers of the faithful:
I believe that the destructive hurricane which hit America, within its own house, was nothing but the result of a prayer of a father or a mother whose son was killed, or of boy who became an orphan, or of a woman whose honor was violated on the lands of Afghanistan, Iraq or others”.
According to Centcom, the Tel Afar offensive continues. 41 suspected terrorists were captured in that city on Sep. 10th as a result of 'Operation Restoring Rights'. Other media reports indicate that as many as 157 al Qaeda linked insurgents were killed in the Tel Afar offensive.
This morning, another operation was launched to root out al Qaeda linked terrorists in Iraq's al Anbar province. The new offensive, Operation 'Cyclone', targetted the terrorist safe haven of Rutbah.
For the past several months, terrorists within Rutbah have escalated their intimidation and murder campaign against the local populace and city government officials. The resulting effect was an increased ability to move freely within the area and a base for them to launch attacks against innocent civilians, Iraqi Security Forces and Coalition Forces.
In recent days, Coalition Forces have also captured Ammar ‘Abd-Al-Hafiz ‘Abd Muhummad (aka Ammar Amam Wakhtif or Sheik Ammar), an admitted terrorist and leader of the lnu’man Brigade, in a raid earlier in September in the Ramadi area. Sayf-al-Din Yahya 'Anad (aka Sheik Sayf or Abu Hamza), a Nu’man Brigade cell leader, was also captured during the raid. He was responsible for organizing and directing attacks against Iraqi Security and Coalition Forces.
Abu Zayd, (above right) identified as the current Al Qaeda in Iraq military emir of Mosul, was also killed in a raid.
Others: In the Bullpen
Posted by: Rusty at
08:43 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 620 words, total size 4 kb.
1
He is beging to sound like a liberal demacrat or JESSIE JACKASSON
Posted by: sandpiper at September 12, 2005 08:57 AM (7/75z)
2
Terrible tear gas I bet. See if ya only had masks zaqueery.
Posted by: Howie at September 12, 2005 09:08 AM (D3+20)
3
They should name this operation:
"Operation gunna beat your hairy ass"
Posted by: FIlthy Allah at September 12, 2005 09:15 AM (5ceWd)
4
Methinks we've got him and his rook of cowards on the run. I've been saving a bottle of champaign for the day we kill his sorry ass. It's chilled and ready. Maybe today?
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 12, 2005 09:39 AM (q9AWQ)
5
Keep it ready Joe. I don't drink, but for this occasion I'll break that rule. Seriously, that will be one of the happiest days of my life.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 12, 2005 10:04 AM (JQjhA)
6
Ah, but how does the NYT and other MSMers cover this particular story? They used the headline that stated:
Many insurgents escape US-Iraqi sweep
Check that a moment.
Google News used those headlines, but the underlying stories did not -
San Jose Mercury news. The San Jose Mercury News reported: Militant positions were found mainly deserted Sunday, and the invading force discovered a network of tunnels below the city through which the insurgents were believed to have fled to the surrounding countryside.
Brig. Gen. Abdul Aziz Mohammed-Jassim, spokesman for the Iraqi army in Tal Afar, said the final insurgent death toll was 157, with 291 suspected militants captured. He said one Iraqi soldier was killed Monday, bringing the army death toll to at least six for the entire operation. Six civilians died, he said.
The U.S. military reported a similar number of insurgent deaths, 141, a day earlier. No U.S. soldiers were killed, it said. Sounds to me like they got a bunch of terrorists to me. No way to know why or how Google News put together that headline except out of wishful thinking?!
Posted by: lawhawk at September 12, 2005 10:22 AM (AcoYr)
7
Perhaps a better way to express your joy at the POS being dispatched to his 72 virgins by the Marine Corps extreme dating unit, is perhaps to disrupt one of the evil speeches going on at a Mosque near you. Maybe, stand out side the mosque with a large Cross and say "weeeza cummin fer ya!"
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 12, 2005 11:40 AM (5ceWd)
8
So how do they explain the "terrible wrath of God" that killed thousands of Muslims in the Tsunami? was that the result of some Christian's prayer?
Posted by: dave at September 12, 2005 01:08 PM (CcXvt)
9
Dave, they blame the tsunami on the child sex industry in Thailand. Go figure.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 12, 2005 01:39 PM (q9AWQ)
10
For a real thrill why dont we use laughing gas on them instaed it would lighten them up
Posted by: sandpiper at September 12, 2005 01:40 PM (U+eLg)
11
Filthy Allah(may your name be praised),
Marine Corp extreme dating unit!
ROTFLMAO
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 12, 2005 01:55 PM (q9AWQ)
12
The Guardian is who came up with that title, lawhawk, and it seems Google liked that one best.
Posted by: Oyster at September 12, 2005 02:19 PM (fl6E1)
13
On the audiotape, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi is heard to say:
"What de faaaack! Day keep on comming! Don't dez Freakin Infidels stop shooting at us for 5 fuking minutes? Mahmoood! Stop bleeding on my carpet...you are leaking like a sieve you ass! I just bought that. Dammit!"
Posted by: Filthy Allah at September 12, 2005 03:24 PM (5ceWd)
14
Filthy Allah(peace be upon you),
You're funny! Hahaha!
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 12, 2005 04:42 PM (q9AWQ)
15
This is comming from extremists who want to use anthrax to kill as many people as they can
Posted by: sandpiper at September 13, 2005 09:46 AM (ILvmZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 09, 2005
Report of al Qaeda Takeover of al Qaim: "A Crock"
Reports that al Qaim, an Iraqi city near the Syrian border, have fallen into the hands of al Qaeda forces are "a crock of crap", The Marine Corps Times reports today.
The Washington Post had earlier reported that eye witnesses were claiming that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al Qaeda in Iraq flag was flying over the city, that a sign reading "Welcome to The Islamic Kingdom of Qaim" hung over a mosque, and that an accused prostitute had been murdered in the city under harsh new Islamic law.
The Marine Corps, deployed in the area, is now denying those reports.
Maj. Neil Murphy, a spokesman for II Marine Expeditionary Force, told The Marine Corps Times that reports detailing an all-out al-Qaida takeover in Qaim were a “crock of crap.”
“Sure, anyone can hang up a poster. That does not mean anything,” Murphy wrote in an e-mail response to questions. “We have a battalion there. [The insurgents] are continually moving to try and find safety, but we are rooting them out and we’ll root them out of Qaim, too.”
Centcom has made no official statement about the developing situation in al Qaim. However, off-the-record, an official at Centcom was wary of denying these reports to The Jawa Report.
The area in and around al Qaim is a well known route used by al Qaeda terrorists between Syria and Iraq. In recent weeks, Iraqis loyal to the government have been fighting tribes loyal to al Qaeda. The US military has been supporting our allies on the ground in the area through an intense aerial campaign.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:50 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So what else is new. The media is not in Qaim. The media is in their hotels in Bagdad. The media has it's agenda and is phoning in its reports ala Hunter Thompson. And the media no longer has the audience monopoly, credibility or influence it use to have. I wonder why.
Posted by: hondo at September 09, 2005 07:02 PM (4Gtyc)
2
hey rusty, why didn't you post the press you got at Instapundit? Is that really you? 20 something? man, put the books down and hit the gym.
Posted by: Mr. K at September 09, 2005 07:44 PM (ztNCV)
3
Jenna and Osama got married and live in Qaim dammit!!
Posted by: Downing Street Memo at September 10, 2005 01:22 AM (TAhhF)
4
Of course they control Qaim, and I'm the King of Kafiristan!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 11, 2005 09:05 AM (0yYS2)
5
And are the news media ready to print another famous headline DEWY DEFEATS TRUMAN again?
Posted by: sandpiper at September 13, 2005 09:52 AM (ILvmZ)
6
I'm John Hoellwarth. I wrote the story about this for Marine Corps Times. I called the Post and talked to a repp at thier Foreign desk who said the paper stands behind their reporters, who only rely on "first-hand observations." He asked me to forward him the e-mail I got from Maj. Murphy and I told him he could just read about it in my paper Monday. But, the funny thing was, he then challenged me to get Maj. Murphy to prove that al-Qaida had not taken the town. He was challenging Maj. Murphy to prove a negative, wholy based on his infexible assumption that his reporter was 100 percent accurate. This reporter, of course, is a credible journlaist who didn't make it to the Post by fabricating stories. On the other hand, Maj. Murphy is the spokesman for the Marines who are operating in that entire region, including Qaim. It is his business to know more than the average reporter about enemy activity in his area. So, here we have two credible sources with completely opposite information. Personally, I think the disconnect comes from the reporter's end. She's reporting from Baghdad with the help of correspondents in places other than Qaim as well. I can't prove that she didn't talk to eye witnesses, but it's hard for me to imagine that she's got better info than the Marines in Qaim's vicinity. Nevertheless, the Post said it remained "Completely confident" in the fact gathering od its reporters.
After gathering all that info and filing my story, I went golfing and forgot about the whole thing. My job rocks.
Posted by: The Notebook Ninja at September 14, 2005 10:49 AM (r/1lb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 08, 2005
Hundreds of Terrorists Captured in Iraq, al Qaeda Leader Killed
The Iraqi Interior Ministry is reporting that hundreds of terrorists have been rounded up in the Tal Afar region near the Syrian border. Of the 200 terrorists captured, 150 of them were foreign fighters from Syria, Sudan, Yemen and Jordan.
Centcom is also reporting that between Sept. 4th and 5th combined Iraqi and Coalition teams captured over 50 terrorist suspects in the Baghdad area. One of the captured terrorists was found with a note indicating he was about to become a suicide bomber.
In addition, US forces bombed a known al Qaeda safehouse in near the Syrian border. The target was a known bomb-making cell leader, Abu Mohammad, who has been linked extensively to other al Qaida terrorists and foreign fighters in Husaybah and throughout the Western Euphrates Valley. Additionally, he is known to have worked directly for Abu Islam, the al Qaida 'Emir' of Husaybah, who was killed by a Coalition air strike last week.
Husaybah is located near the city of al Qaim, said to now be controlled by forces loyal to Abu Musab al Zarqawi's al Qaeda in Iraq. Sources within the U.S. military have not denied these reports to The Jawa Report. Tribes loyal to Zarqawi and those aligned with the Iraqi government have been engaged in severe fighting in the past several weeks. I expect (or hope) that many more bombs will fall on these locations in the next few days.
Way to go Team America, f*ck yeah!!
Others: Dred Pundit Bluto
Posted by: Rusty at
04:39 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Wow, another defeat for the democrats!
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 08, 2005 04:46 PM (0yYS2)
2
Randy, surely you jest. The Religion of Peace is not involved in any kind of insurrection in Iraq. Jihad is a struggle of the mind and spirit. The inner peace of the jihad overwhelms all the outside warmongering of the infidels and the crusaders.
Besides, you know that Islamic Law does not see the crudader Christians and kaffirs as people. The Sharia Law only applies to Muslims, and I can kill the Christian dogs and rape the kaffirs with impunity. Doesn't the Koran tell me to kill them and plunder their wealth?
Can I be charged with killing or raping a Christian dog? Why do you think we want the Sharia? Hell, man, we can kill and rape and plunder and still be following the mandate of the Koran. In other words, we can kill and we can have all the sex we want to with the kaffirs because Allah doesn't see them as people. They are the slaves of Allah and he has placed them here for our use.
Gee, Randy, get a grip. You're going to give us jihadis a bad name if you don't stop with your shit.
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 08, 2005 05:10 PM (q9AWQ)
3
200 more whiners to feed. 3/4 of them foreigners? And they're there for the tourist sites?
Too bad they weren't "shot while escaping."
Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at September 08, 2005 05:32 PM (Oy3+T)
4
heh, religious dogs, funny.
Who's Randy?
Posted by: tyler at September 08, 2005 06:27 PM (t+GZI)
5
I just updated my post after watching the Newshour With Jim Lehrer on PBS. Lehrer mentioned that Tal Afar was surrounded and that there was "heavy fighting", but neglected to mention that
two hundred terrorists were captured. No bias here, folks, move along.
Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 08, 2005 06:28 PM (RHG+K)
6
Randy is the psydonym that the great Dr. Rusty Shackleford has to use now that the evil professor Mohamad Al-Khodry of West Virgina University is on to him. He cannot let the evil professor discover his true identity.
NOW, WTF? What has happened to all the rednecks in West Virgina? We need a redneck alert in wherever the hell West Virginia University is. Do they have universities in West Virginia?
Posted by: jesusland joe at September 08, 2005 06:44 PM (q9AWQ)
7
The rednecks were all driven underground by a concerted attack by leftist, anti-American organizations such as the ADL, ACLU, and NAACP, with the government doing the dirty work. Not only are whites now unable to publicly declare love for their own people, but are even forbidden from responding to a threat to their safety. I guarantee you that when the first terror supporter is lynched, the media will go into a hysterical frenzy, screaming racism from every housetop, but I think that few people really give a damn what the media says anymore, because it's clear they're not on our side.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 08, 2005 10:20 PM (0yYS2)
8
Book em danno cuff em and stuff em
Posted by: sandpiper at September 10, 2005 07:16 PM (JyNSh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Capt. Michael "Scott" Speicher Still Alive?
This CNN article implies that the Navy still believes Speicher is alive after 14 years. That would be a miracle indeed. But isn't it more logical to conclude, after all this time, that if any former Hussein regime officials 'know of his location' that they are now talking about the location of his body? I pray that he is still alive, but it would be shocking to find out that he still was.
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
01:34 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was an airman in Speicher's airwing working on the USS SARATOGA flight deck the night of the First Strike against Iraq in 1991. I remember saluting him as a LCDR. I think its cool that he's a Captain now.
FLY NAVY
Lars Farmer
Wichita KS
libertyhound@hotmail.com
Posted by: Lars Farmer at September 09, 2005 12:11 AM (m1Jfn)
2
Perhaps we should be asking Saddam himself if we haven't already done so?
Posted by: Macker at September 09, 2005 12:52 PM (2GH66)
3
When we captured Saddam; The whereabouts of Captain Speicher was the 2nd question we asked him.
To me if Scott were alive I would not be nearly as shocked as I am to learn that 15 yrs later we are having to (at this late date) "suggest" that our government involve state dept, Iraqi embassy etc. Bremmer should have demanded more on Scott before giving away any power, money and assistance to the (then) newly forming Iraqi
gov't.
Posted by: Liberty at September 09, 2005 03:43 PM (m10mW)
4
Why is it: When you do a google search /News/ then type in Scott Speicher.....You get the context abreviated for this article and a few others stating the opposite of the body of the articles and AP report.
"They left out "Board has found NO EVIDENCE THAT...."
so it reads " CPT Scott Speicher is dead....."
They took him off the KIA list and sent all his back pay and current paychecks to his wife....yet since then...over 5,000 days later....this guy just can't get a break; not in DC, and not in the press.
THANKS GOOGLE, HAPPY National P.O.W. Recognition day to you too!
Sept 16. 2005
Posted by: Jeff at September 17, 2005 07:35 AM (WE7En)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 05, 2005
Al Qaeda Siezes Town in Iraq
While this is not good news, it is important to realize that the
U.S. had been pounding the town off and on for over a week. The town has been the center of fighting between a pro-government Sunni tribe and a tribe that has aligned itself with al Qaeda. No government forces are in the city. With no one apparently in control, al Qaeda has instituted harsh sharia law and is murdering citizens and closing down any business that sells anything that smack of Western culture.
Washington Post:
Abu Musab Zarqawi's foreign-led Al Qaeda in Iraq took open control of a key western town at the Syrian border, deploying its guerrilla fighters in the streets and flying Zarqawi's black banner from rooftops, tribal leaders and other residents in the city and surrounding villages said.
A sign newly posted at the entrance of Qaim declared, "Welcome to the Islamic Kingdom of Qaim." A statement posted in mosques described Qaim as an "Islamic kingdom liberated from the occupation."...
Armed insurgent fighters loyal to the Jordanian-born Zarqawi openly traveled Qaim's streets. The fighters included both Iraqis and foreigners, including Afghans The foreign-led fighters hung rooftops with Zarqawi's al-Qaeda banner of black backgrounds with a yellow sun.
Shops selling CDs, a movie theater and a women's beauty parlor were newly burned, apparently targeted by Zarqawi's group under its strict interpretation of Islamic law.
This is what is at stake in Iraq now.
Posted by: Rusty at
04:32 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
1
That's not all...
“The city of Karbala is presently under complete occupation of the Iranian regime and has been taken over”, the daily Iraq al-Ghad
http://regimechangeiran.blogspot.com/2005/09/irans-intelligence-service-occupies.html
Posted by: DoctorZin at September 05, 2005 10:33 PM (hH3WM)
2
You seem like one of the few sites to have picked up on this.
If someone can post above or email me preferably, any links relating to the above Washington Post story that deal with new/more information regarding the situation or with any viedo/internet claims by the AMZ organization that you may come across.
As far as I know the Washington Post is claiming anything, and it is alot for just one article. It seems no other news journalist or sources are putting out cooberating reporting: they are only just resorting to reposting the WP article.
Thanks!
Posted by: PFC Gardner at September 06, 2005 11:36 AM (0hzhL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
124kb generated in CPU 0.0529, elapsed 0.1685 seconds.
130 queries taking 0.1378 seconds, 393 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.