Dear Mr. President
Dear President Amalamaramalamadingdong or whatever your name is, of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Permit me to release 25 years worth of pent up rage and frustration by saying:
I believe the Islamic Republic of Iran must be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Apologies to the majority of Iranian citizens who are pro-American, perhaps we can work together to just wipe your government from the face of the Earth.
Posted by: Vinnie at
06:46 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Iranian People must start the ball rolling if they want to take back their country from the mullahs,
BEFORE it becomes a smoldering radioactive ruin!
If they don't they have no one to blame but themselves.
Posted by: Macker at October 29, 2005 08:08 AM (lJ27j)
2
Well, they have all sorts of people in their corner. Get a load of this one: Prince Chuckie no less (no more either): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/30/nchas30.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/10/30/ixportaltop.html
He plans to plead Islam's case with Bush come November. But he can't be bothered to say a word about Iran's nastiness with wanting to wipe Israel "off the map". I'd like to see that map Iran is using, btw. I thought Israel didn't exist to them .. in most Muslim countries. Oh well, the ironies of it all. Forward march, Israel! Put those size 12s right in their bungholes.
Posted by: Bubbe at October 29, 2005 07:04 PM (cbAi4)
3
Bubbe, the maps printed in that part of the world have the entire country of Israel labelled "Occupied Palestine." Their idiocy is only matched by their ignorance.
Posted by: Dave at October 30, 2005 04:29 AM (zN+oa)
4
Prince Charles is a leftie fool. He should listen to his daddy who talks alot of sense.
Posted by: Jester at October 30, 2005 04:57 PM (QKZX5)
5
ALL AMERICANS AND JEWISH CUNTS MUST DIE.
The Jew is a vile creature descended from monkeys and pigs.
Jerusalem will be muslim once again - or else New York will be burn again.
Posted by: Fuck You at November 16, 2005 07:03 AM (paU9H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Iranian President Reaffirms "Final Solution", Reveals Tehran's Weakness
Patriotism is not the last refuge of a scoundrel, antisemitism is. The great unifying theme of the Islamic world is hatred of Israel. Thus, when the President of Iran calls for
a final solution for the Jewish state in the Middle East, and then
reiterates that position again today, it is not simply an act of antisemitism, it is an act of desperation. It reveals the weakness of the Iranian theocracy's position.
Change is coming to the Middle East. Like the smell of ozone after a lightning strike it is in the air. The mullahs in Iran sense it is coming and they are afraid. Very afraid.
And what do those who have a stake in maintaining power do to distract the masses from their own plight? Blame the Jews.
There really is no "Middle Eastern culture", only "Middle Eastern cultures". Persian, Turks, Kurds and Assyrians speak different languages and have unique traditions and cultures. The "Arab street" does not exist, but there are "Arab streets". Hip-hop music, I am told, has become the language of protest for young Gazans, and while terrorist videos are sold in markets throughout the region sales of pornography are much higher.
But, if there is one thing that can unify the many Middle Eastern cultures and the many Arab streets, it is antisemitism. Nasser did not become an icononclastic hero in the Middle East for the Aswan project, he became a hero because he "stood up" to Israel.
Secular liberals, Islamists, nationalists, and even Christians in the Middle East all agree that Israel has no right to exist. Some realists might believe that peace with Israel is inevitable, but not that it is right. In the eyes of the secular left in the Middle East, and like their European and American counterparts, Israel is the last bastion of Wetern colonialism and imperialsim. To Islamists and nationalists it represents a sort of emasculation to the collective psyche. And to the long-oppressed Christians of the region it represents a source of destabilization used by their oppressors as another excuse to crack down on them. Israel, it is widely believed, is the source of injustice in the region.
So, when the President of Iran calls for the destruction of Israel the reaction from the street is a foregone conclusion: they will support him. He knows this. He is not stupid.
Iran has dreams of becoming a regional superpower. They seek nuclear power, for instance, not because the oil-rich nation really needs it, but because nuclear power represents something bigger. It puts Iran on par with the "big boys" of the industrialized world.
Iran's main disadvantage for a regional hegemony is that it is an Islamist nation unlike the larger Islamist movement. It is Shia, and compared to the Islamist theories of bin Laden or Zarqawi relatively progressive. So, what can the bin Ladenists and the followers of the Ayattolah agree upon? The destruction of the "Zionist entity."
More than this, the mullahs of Iran aren't simply trying to elevate themselves among the jihadis, they are trying to elevate themselves in the eyes of the the entire Middle East. The move to a theocratic state is probably not a great unifying theme among a region as diverse as the Middle East, but a move to wipe-out Israel is.
Even if it is only rhetoric, it is powerful rhetoric. It is the kind of rhetoric that unifies. It is the kind of rhetoric that moves people to admiration and adoration. It is the kind of rhetoric that gives power both within a country's own borders and beyond. And when a regime feels itself vulnurable, its first move will be to bolster its power.
Expect more anti-Israeli speeches in the future. As the tides of change sweep through the Middle East we should find such rhetoric more and more common.
The last resort of the scoundrals that dominate the region will be to verbally attack Israel.
[PS-still on blog sabbatical, but felt this needed saying]
Posted by: Rusty at
09:12 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 672 words, total size 4 kb.
1
When someone declares that it is OK to promote a Final Solution on someone else, they unknowingly make it OK for it to be promoted against themselves. I don't think Osama and friends have met Hannibal Lechter yet.
Posted by: Ernie Oporto at October 28, 2005 09:43 AM (/lpvu)
2
The enmity between the sons of Isaac and Ishmael. This conflict has been going on for 4000 years, and it is much bigger than most even realize. The arabs view the land the Israelis occupy as their birthright and will not be satisfied until either the Israelis or themselves are all dead.
There never will be peace in the Middle East.
Posted by: Vonski at October 28, 2005 09:46 AM (Srmrz)
3
The Iranians are not Arabs, so what is their beef with Israel? The Iranians are so stupid that they overlook the Final Solution that the Sunni Muslims have in store for them. Frankly, I think the whole bunch of them are crazy.
They have the resources and people to make a paradise out of the Middle East, just like Beirut used to be, but their stupid religion turns them into a bunch of lunatics. I know the situation can change, and I hope that is the outcome, but with the crazies in charge of the countries in the Mideast and the lack of freedom the people have to be productive, I fear for the outcome.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 28, 2005 10:32 AM (rUyw4)
4
Rusty forgot his blogaway transdermal patch this morning.
Posted by: Howie at October 28, 2005 11:46 AM (D3+20)
5
A major part of Iran's official foreign policy is to try to destroy Israel. Why is this? There are Muslim countries that have territorial disputes with Iran, Muslim countries that have fought wars against Iran, Muslim countries that supported wars against Iran, Muslim countries that have massacred Muslims (Syria, for instance, murdered 10,000 people in Hama), and Muslim countries that have occupied whole countries (Syria in Lebanon and Iraq in Kuwait).
Iran has never threatened to wipe any of these Muslim countries off the map.
Israel has done none of these things.
The only reason why Iran wants to destroy Israel is because Israel is not a Muslim country. This should give the leaders of other countries pause. Israel is only the closest and most convenient target for this kind of madness.
Curiously, the only outright criticism of Ahmadinejad's words by any Muslim or Arab politician came from a Palestinian, Saeb Erakat. The PA is usually a press office for terror gangs, but in this particular case, I need to tip my hat to Erakat for doing the right thing.
Posted by: The Left Coast at October 28, 2005 11:15 PM (SWXaQ)
6
Oops. My bad. Turkey also rejected Ahmadinejad's speech.
Posted by: The Left Coast at October 28, 2005 11:19 PM (SWXaQ)
7
Yeah, but Turkey is trying to get into the EU. Doesn't count.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 29, 2005 02:20 PM (rUyw4)
8
Iran is a terrorist supporting nation and a member of the UN we should have nothing to do with the UN
Posted by: sandpiper at October 29, 2005 05:44 PM (EPfmS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lashing Out At Bloggers In Iran
Iranian blogger gets 30 lashes.
Wonder what Tim "There's a chill wind blowing" Robbins, Martin "tape across the mouth" Sheen, and the Dixie "nice hooters, no brains" Chicks might think about that.
Oh, I forgot, these people don't have much time for actual thought.
Posted by: Vinnie at
10:45 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Since the libtards love islamofascism so much, they probably would like to do the same here. Probably, hell! I know they would.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 22, 2005 12:24 AM (0yYS2)
2
Wheres bill clinton objecting to this like he did when that american youth in SINAPORE got four wacks with a rattan cane when he was cuaght vandalising cars i mean this persons getting 30 lashes why isnt bill clinton not asking it be metted down to 15 lashes?
Posted by: sandpiper at October 22, 2005 07:48 AM (4pkrX)
3
Sandpiper, it's because of how liberals think. In the Soviet Union's gulags, political prisoners, who had committed no crime other than to not accept Party lies, had it far worse than actual criminals, who were often assigned to be trustee guards or even actual guards over them. Political prisoners were far more likely to die in confinement from abuse and starvation, whereas normal criminals were generally treated better.
You see, liberals are always willing to excuse crime because it helps to destroy good order in society, which then makes the people call for stronger laws and more police, which can then be used to suppress dissent and jail dissidents. Does this not sound familiar? How about "hate crimes"? How about "zero tolerance"?
Liberals' plans require that they accomodate any act or thought that hurts society, so they actively seek to shelter from justice those groups who are most responsible for all crimes in society. The plan, as laid by Marx and Lenin, was always to foster and foment the decay of society by encouraging the criminal elements to undermine societal order, and once society was at the point of collapse, Big Brother uses the opportunity to step in and crushes everyone under the iron boot of law and order, and the people will thank him for it.
Liberals' only goal is the destruction of Western civilization, and all one has to do to seek evidence of this fact is to read Marx, Ingles, Lenin, Trotsky, as well as modern scum like the ACLU, et al. All liberals, socialists, democrats, communists, etc., are the enemies of civilization and must all be destroyed before they destroy civilization. I am
not simply using hyperbole when I say that all liberals should be hanged or shot, because if they are left unchecked, that is exactly what they have in store for the rest of the world if they can ever establish a global dictatorship as they want to do.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 22, 2005 10:44 AM (0yYS2)
4
ummm. I don't think it is just the liberals that cosy up to those muslims. If they got oil wel(s) than all the politicans seem willing to line up to jump in bed with them. I can't think of any state as tightly controlled as Saudi Arabia.Like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia might be a good place to send some of our excess of liberals.
Posted by: john Ryan at October 22, 2005 09:36 PM (ads7K)
5
John,
I would like to send some of our excess of liberals to blog in Iran. I think they should receive an up close personal look at the people they support.
Posted by: jesusland joe at October 22, 2005 10:30 PM (rUyw4)
6
Dude!
What did you do to the site? It's all green and shit! You used to have such a pleasing color thing going on.
Posted by: ZuDfunck at October 23, 2005 02:20 AM (Xkvxi)
7
Point of order with regards to the 'Dixie "nice hooters, no brains" Chicks' comment. Those three have had a lot of time on their hands in the last few years since they stopped making money and have spent much of it breast-feeding practically non-stop. I would have to take the points and go with the 'under' on that bet.
Posted by: slug at October 23, 2005 02:51 AM (XRVMG)
8
You're right on the money this time John, but liberals are just scum with misguided principles, whereas politicans are just unprincipled scum. We should send all liberals
and all politicians to the Middle East.
Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at October 23, 2005 02:47 PM (0yYS2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
31kb generated in CPU 0.017, elapsed 0.111 seconds.
119 queries taking 0.0997 seconds, 255 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.